Generally when we in the LGBT community discuss the older generation, it is a somewhat dark subject. While there are very few people in the world I wish death upon ( ok maybe this guy ) there is a general consensus in our community that the only way for us to gain a complete victory on our civil rights, is to have the older generation die off. But is this really the case?
While there is an obvious demographic split with younger people far more likely to be supportive of LGBT civil rights as seen this graph from 2009, this is not the only factor to consider. It is my firm belief, that young people in the 1960’s and 1970’s were more likely than their parents to be accepting of interracial marriage and civil rights in general. However, one only has to look around today to see that racism is unfortunately still present, and still an evil that permeates our society. We ostracize those who make their hate public, make laws in an attempt to prevent that hate from influencing employment and house, and still the hate persists.
In a similar manner we should expect to be fighting against the hate, intolerance, and secret bigotry against the LGBT community for decades. This doesn’t mean we need to take it laying down, but rather we need to fight back, we need to not forget our allies, we need to make sure we are not being discriminatory even as we are being discriminated against.
The picture above is George H. W. Bush, the 41st president of the United States, and was a Republican president from 1989-1993. He is 89 years old, he and his wife Barbara Bush just served as official witnesses to a same sex couple’s wedding. I’m not going to get bogged down into the politics during his presidency, or what his positions were 20 years ago, I wasn’t a fan of his then, and looking back with 20/20 hindsight, I am still not a fan of decisions he made during his presidency. What’s important here is my opinion that we have people of a much older generation, supporting LGBT civil rights, and they shouldn’t be written off as our enemies.
Why is it we in the LGBT community, who understand what prejudice feels like first hand, are so quick to prejudge others based solely upon their age? We need to understand and fight our own prejudices, even as we work to fight against the prejudices of others. Let us not forget our allies. Let us not forget how many of the older generation are veterans in the war for civil liberties, how many fought for racial equality, women’s rights, and who will fight for LGBT equality.
Let us not marginalize our allies simply because they have grown old, let us instead remember it was an 83 year old woman named Edith Windsor who brought the case to strike down the Defense Of Marriage Act in the US.
A few days ago the HuffPo posted an article on how few atheists there are in Congress right now, or rather, that there are currently public atheists in congress right now. I’m reminded of what a patient told me one morning as they were lying in bed, “when you’re on your back, the only way to look is up.” Just a year ago a Pew Poll was released showing “Nones”, those of us who don’t identify with any religion, make up 20% of the population as a whole, and 33% of the population under 30. This means that out of 535 members of Congress there should be around 107 who can identify with the concerns and needs of the “none” community. (107 is 20% of 535 for those of you who don’t remember your primary school maths)
When you’re tired of just looking up, and take a moment to turn your head side to side, you see just how many of those around us are also laying on their back, under represented by those in power who make decisions.
The same Pew Poll mentioned above found there were 3.5 million Muslims in the US, which is about 1% of the total US population, meaning there should be 5-6 Muslims in Congress, yet there is only 1 muslim in congress. This is one more representative than we have, and it is remarkable, given the fear and bigotry surrounding Islam is even greater than that surrounding atheism.
The LGB part of the LGBT community has 6 openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual members, while the Transgendered community is still searching for representation. Perhaps Paula Overby will change that next year, which will help yet another under represented electorate, women. There are 98 women in Congress, yes, almost 20%, the same percentage we should expect to see of atheists, agnostics, or other non spiritual or otherwise non religiously affiliated persons. However, as many of you are undoubtedly aware, women make up a good deal more of the population than 20%
I don’t wish to be misunderstood. I do understand completely that not every group in America can have a proportionate representation based upon their percentage of the American population. There are approximately 250,000 Railfans in the US, that does not mean they deserve the 1/2 a congressperson their proportional demographic is equal to be properly represented.
Beliefs, and non-belief, of religion and spirituality though are important aspects of American Culture, many people base their entire lives and morals on what they feel is divinely written, spoken, or inspired. There are many Americans who feel the laws of the country should reflect the instructions of their particular theology, from lefty hippies invoking crystals and oneness with nature or mega church evangelicals, they believe the country and the world would be a better place if we followed their teachings
Meanwhile we have to contend with people like this who believe those of us without belief in their god are destroying this country. He is not alone, and the Left has no right to be haughty. The 2012 Democratic National Convention took a verbal “yea / nay” vote on whether or not to mention “God” in their party platform. The nays won out as you can clearly hear and see in the clip below.
Why did the DNC keep the god reference in, why were they so afraid to keep god out? My opinion is that we None’s are not vocal enough at the polls. We don’t necessarily have to vote Democrat, Republican, or any other party, but we do have vote. We also have to make sure our families, our communities, and our representatives know we are here, and we’re growing.
We need to come out of the closet, we need to have representation, and we need to not allow the religious to impose their religion on us with out our consent. If we do that, it can only get better.
Real Time with Bill Maher is one of the few shows I love, and can honestly say with a DVR, Xfinity OnDemand, and HBO podcasts, I never miss an episode. Real Time brings to America something that is missing from almost every other political talk show, Real Time brings opposing views, and then allows them to talk. It was listening to the podcasted episode from 9/13/13, which prompted this posting.
Bill Maher is an outspoken atheist, something I can really get behind, there aren’t enough people in the popular media who are willing to speak out against all religion He is also outspoken on the anti-science policies of the conservative right such as; climate change denial, anti-evolution, and basic human sexual reproduction. However, these are the low hanging fruit, and one would expect an atheist who is as adamantly anti-theist as Bill to speak out against these religious based ideologies.
Bill fails when it comes to issues from the left such as GMO safety, science based medicine, biology, even occasionally fossil fuels. When it comes to these issues, he displays his scientific illiteracy proudly, making it clear he should remove the plank in his eye prior to commenting on the speck of dust in his political adversary.
Edwin Lyman, Senior Scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, was explaining the environmental hazards posed by the damaged Fukushima reactor site which is currently leaking 300 tons of radioactive water a day into the ocean.
“In my assessment the dose associated with the leakage is not an immediate biological threat at this point, but it does tell us It does tell us they [Japan] don’t have control of the site, and that’s very troubling because there is still an enormous amount of radioactive material they have to clean up over the decades”
Bill immediately responds, asking Mr. Lyman why he doesn’t think the current rate of leakage is currently posing an immediate threat. Mr. Lyman explains how the ocean dilutes, how 300 tons of radioactive water a day diluted into the ocean will not cause seafood or swimming to be any more unsafe. Bill isn’t having any of that:
“I don’t like that low amount theory……I disagree with lots of people in the medical field about this. The idea that you know, a small amount of poison is okay. I don’t like any amount of poison”
Mr. Lyman agrees the scientific consensus on radiation exposure is there is no safe level, and then goes on to briefly mention fringe pseudoscience health claims regarding radiation exposure. It is upon this point that Bill shows his hypocrisy.
“Radiation is good for you? Who are these people, and let me guess which political party?”
Many chuckles from Bill and the audience as this is an obvious reference to the Republican party, and their proud anti-science views, especially on matters of environmental importance. Yet Bill seems blind to what he just did, how just moments ago he made an unscientific statement, and is now lampooning the right for making unscientific statements.
This is simply one example, and I’m only picking on Bill because 1, he can take it; and 2 because he is a well known face of the Left whose opinions on science reach a large audience of political like minded people.
Other examples include:
This isn’t just Bill though, this kind of thinking is to the Left what creationism is to the Right
Unscientific thinking permeates the culture, and is embraced by the Left and when it comes to food is mainstream. Organic, farm raised, natural fill in the blank foods are hailed as more healthy than genetically modified foods, despite scientific evidence to the contrary. Lost on the left is understanding that everything is a chemical, including water. Supplements, vitamins, anti-oxidants, immune system boosters, detoxification, all pseudo-science happily being pushed by the Left into mainstream, none supported by actual double blind clinic trials.
As I stated above, I love watching and listening to Real Time, however one needs to listen with a grain of salt, and remember that when it comes to allowing one’s personal beliefs to color one’s understanding and acceptance of science, Bill is no better than those he is criticizing.
Last week a questionnaire focusing on issues important to many members of the atheist community was emailed to both Representative John Kline, and his opponent Ms. Paula Overby.
A big thank you to my fellow Washingtonians at the Ask An Atheist podcast for use of their questionnaire. Below is my email to both candidates, unfortunately only Ms. Paula Overby has responded. I have placed her responses in bold.
My email and the responses as follows:
Thank you for your time, I know it is valuable.
Just looking for an agree or disagree for the following statements; you may of course feel free to elaborate as you see fit. All answers will be posted to the http://www.transatheistpod.com blog, and a copy of this questionnaire has being sent to Representative John Kline.
I do believe that anyone wanting to represent the citizens of our district has an obligation to respond to legitimate questions. In my experience our current representative, John Kline, screens questions, offering his own editorial in support of his own agenda. I do not consider that to be representative government.
Thank you for your inquiry.
1. The planet Earth is closer to 4.7 billion years than it is to 6,000 years old.
2. The diversity of life on Earth is best explained through biological evolution by natural selection.
True, though the term natural selection is not precise and a simple response to this question is clearly not a thorough response.
3. Vaccinations are not responsible for childhood autism.
True. 14 studies including millions of children in several countries consistently show no significant difference in autism rates between children who got the MMR vaccine those who didn’t. The anecdotal evidence suggesting a link in no way justifies the fear that it generates about vaccines and the enormous benefits derived from vaccination.
4. Deckard was a Replicant.
I don’t know. If you are asking about Blade Runner? Yes, I’ve seen it.
5. It is very unlikely that the United States government is hiding flying saucers or alien bodies.
True. though it’s still fun to imagine.
6. Atheists and agnostics are just as capable of living happy, rewarding, and moral lives as religious believers.
That has been my experience with Atheists I have known.
7. A well-qualified candidate’s atheism would not prevent me from voting for or endorsing their candidacy.
True. Though I am Christian myself, I fully support separation of Church and state. As a participant in transgender ministries I have worked with faith leaders in Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and Native American spirituality.
8. I believe that a strong separation between church and the state is the best way to preserve religious liberty.
True. It is apparent to me that the strong government intervention in religious traditions has had a very negative impact on faith communities in the United States. I find that faith communities are seeking greater autonomy and higher levels of responsibility for the values of their own communities.
9. I believe that the United States of America is not officially a Christian nation.
True. According to separation of church and state there can be no national religion. It is not even clear that Christians are a majority. It depends on widely variant definitions.
10. I would support legislation that would remove “Under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance and restore it to its pre-1954 version.
It would not be a priority but I would certainly be willing to vote in favor of it.
11. George Lucas was mistaken to make prequels to his “Star Wars” trilogy.
Can’t really agree with this one. My son absolutely loves “Star Wars” and I love my son.